| As a student of the fourth estate it is my responsibility to have my personal and professional motives well aligned within the ethical lines of my vocation. What am I doing, and why. In particular I try to adhere to the National Union of Journalist’s guidelines. For some Solomon reason I must, attempt at least, to view all sides of a story with impartiality; thus my own writings on the Tribunal should reflect this same equivocal neutrality.As this is a blog, however, and bounded only by my imagination, I hereby enact the ‘I’ll Say What I Want Protocol’. I may, herein, rove in whatever fashion I so please.There are times as I sit and watch the Taoiseach, answering questions about his finances in the 90s, when I am enraged. Our glorious leader, our honest John, Our Bertie, blurting out unbelievable blurb.
Sometimes I seeth at the temerity of his testimony.
His marriage left him broke. Without a farthing. Yet he had 54 grand.
He knew nothing about a dig-out before it happened, yet he opened a Special Savings Account two weeks prior, if a forged receipt is any evidence.
In such dire financial straights, was it prudent, or indeed ethical, of AIB to lend him an unsecured loan and not charge him interest on it for 18 months.
Was it appropriate, that as Taoiseach he was receiving checks from Wildover Ltd. Or that the shelf company, received and distributed, large sums of money, administered by Des Richardson.
And a thousand other questions.
The real question is how long will Bertie continue to mislead the Tribunal. He misled the Tribunal for one and a half years concerning the sterling sums he received. He misled the country when interviewed by Brian Dobson in September 2006, when he teared-up over his marital separation; a dig-out from friends he blubbed. He misled the electorate when he proclaimed all would be made clear when he appeared in September 2007. In that month, he weaved a |
miscellaneous patchwork of memory lapses, half-truths and excuses.Now here I stew. We’ve been hoodwinked. We’ve been bamboozled. We’ve been had. There was no goddamned dig-out. No whip-around. No Goddamned chance.The Times, ‘Dig outs queried’ reported likewiseNone of the Manchester posse, could provide any evidence of having given Bertie the alleged monies. Is it really likely that every single contributor at that fabled dinner had taken a thousand in petty cash from their respective businesses and not a docket, not a receipt, not a tag or a credit note, not a sausage remains?
How far does the public’s credulity stretch. In a democracy, is it just to permit the sovereignty of one powerful individual, burdened with the rulership of our state, to reign supreme without censure or recourse.
Or is there another reason for his continued erosion of the public’s faith in government.
Could it be that you just don’t care anymore?
Could it be that you are merely one individual in a nation of millions. One particle in the universe without power or gravitas. One cell in the body politic with no say in where you go.
A body weakened with the cancerous cells of corruption.
Perhaps there is no such thing as democracy.
But forget about all that. Let’s get back to the facts. A Tribunal is a body of state. And if a witness willfully misleads or conceals facts from the Tribunal, it is a crime. Prosecutable by the High Court.
Has Mr. Ahern willfully misled the Tribunal? My opinion, is yes, perhaps more, perhaps less than any other before it.
All human life is here, Gilmartin, the embittered land developer, a political system undermined by the powerful lobby of private sector land development ,and TDs in our government. Manchester businessmen ‘in the circle’. Public representatives from across the Irish political spectrum implicated in countless double-deals and goings on.
And it’s been going on for 10 years.
Why aren’t there demonstrations?
Oh, that’s easy, Christmas is coming and the goose is getting fat. |